THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN WINNING AND LOSING IN SILAT 28TH 2015 SEA GAMES SINGAPORE (MALAYSIA MEN CLASS B, E, F AND H)
Shapie, M. N. (12) & Muhammad Zaki, R. (1)
Fakulti Sains Sukan dan Rekreasi, Universiti Teknologi Mara, 40450 Shah Alam, SelangorPertubuhan Seni Gayung Fatani Malaysia
ABSTRACT
This review
is to analysis game of silat olahraga among Malaysian Silat’s group at the Sea
Game 2015. The analysis is based on the video that have been recorded during
the match and use the video as reference. Three skill involved in Pencak Silat
including hit target, hit somewhere else, and miss opponent. This is analysis
the information among winning and losing.
INTRODUCTION
The official name used to indicate more than 800
martial arts schools and styles spread across more than 13,000 islands in
Indonesia called "martial arts". However, this is actually the name
of a compound consisting of two terms that are used in different areas. The
word "martial" and derivatives such dialectics as
"Disabled" (Ontario) and "MANCAK" (Madura and Bali) is
commonly used in Java, Madura and Bali, while the term "art" or
"cold" is used in Sumatra.
The ambition to unite all the different cultures
Phrases In common parlance as part of Indonesian Independence and Unity states
from colonial powers, first expressed in 1948 with the establishment of the
Association of Indonesian Pencak Silat (Indonesian Pencak Silat Association
IPSI). However, he only can free is in 1973 when representatives from schools
and the different styles Finally Officially agreed TO USE "martial
arts" in official discourse, even from SEGi origin is still widely used at
the Local Level.
Pencak silat is a special type of
martial art fighting established in Malay culture, which extends crosswise over
Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Brunei Darussalam, the southern Philippines and
Southern Thailand, and different sports where popular who talk in the Malay
dialect and allude to a typical Malay family line can be found.
Pencak
silat is additionally can be lesson for understudy to understudy to enhance
their abilities. One of pencak silat course objectives is to enhance confident
level. One of learning procedure is amusement approach which is it include
energizing, fun, and propelling for understudies. It make inclusion of
understudies in the class, bigger fervor to enhance and study new propelled
aptitudes, and rousing the understudies to perform well in class.
Motion of analysis for silat is
punch, kick, block, topple, sweep, catch and dodge. Past review demonstrates
that the movement profile during activity time. According to
Shapie, Oliver, O'Donoghue, and Tong (2009), the nature of work periods inside
any battle sports relies on upon the recurrence, volume and kind of the action
being performed. The target of this review is to depict the abilities required
between the champ and washout and in addition to decide the variable that
impact the winner to win.
Therefore, the
objectives of this study are to describe the detail activity that occurs during
the fight time of a silat match, especially the profile of technical events.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A
publicly available video recording of one male silat match from national silat
competition in Malaysia (National Sport Council, Malaysia) was used for the
analysis. This was a male semi-final and final match of class F. Two
pesilat is included from various group or nation. This match comprise of three
rounds, which is two minutes for every round and one minute rest between each
round.This notation involved various skills such as punch, kick, block, catch,
topple and sweep. Usage of Statistical
Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) to calculate the statistical analysis and result. The video
is repeated at least two times so the data can be taken properly. The frequency
was taken as data to be analysed.
Motion categories
Silat exponent’s motions were coded into 14
different types of categories and were defined as follows:
Punch:
The punch ‘tumbuk’ attack is done by a hand with a
closed fist hitting the target. In silat punching is often used to fight the
opponent. It can be a straight punch ‘tumbuk lurus’ or uppercut ‘sauk’ to the
exponent body’s.
Kick:
The kick ‘tendang / terajang’ is an attacking
movement which is performed with one leg or two legs simultaneously. A kick can
be aimed at any target. It can be front kick ‘ tendang depan’, side-kick
‘depak’ or semi-circular side kick ‘tendang lengkar’.
Block:
The blocking movements begin with the posture
position ‘sikap pasang’: the exponent stands straight with his hands around his
body or close to his chest. Blocking or parrying ‘tangkisan’ can be done using
arms, elbows and legs with the purpose to block off or striking back at any
attack.
Catch:
The catch ‘tangkapan’ is done by using the hand to
ob struct the opponent from carrying out an attack. The silat exponent is able
to prevent himself from being attacked by pointing the attack which he has
caught to another direction. A catch which twists or drags the opponent is
forbidden. Also, a catch which could break the part which is being held such as
the leg and waist is also forbidden. These regulations exist to protect the
silat exponent’s.
Topple:
There are various ways of toppling down one’s
opponent. For example, a silat exponent ‘pesilat’ can either push, shove the
opponent’s back leg from the bag or from the side, shove, hit, kick, strike or
punch to make the opponent lose his balance. Every fall is considered valid as
long as the silat exponent topples his opponent down without wrestling or he is
able to overpower the opponent whom he has brought down.
Sweep:
Swiping ‘sapuan’ involves attacking an opponent’s
leg which are on the ground to unstabilise him and bring down to the ground. A
silat exponent can perform this attacking movement either with his right or
left leg, Hence, front sweep ‘sapuan depan’ is done by swinging the leg to the
front to push an opponent’s front leg, while back sweep ‘sapuan belakang’ is
carried out by swinging the leg backward to hit the back leg.
Evade/Dodge:
The evade ‘elakan’ technique is carried out by silat
exponent when he tries to evade an attack. This technique does not require the
silat exponent to touch the opponent in fending off the attack. They are many
ways of carrying out his defensive movement such as dodging ‘gelek’, retreat
‘mundur’, evasion to the side ‘elak sisi’, bending ‘elak serung’, jumping
‘lonjak’, ducking ‘susup’ and etc..
Self-Release:
Self-release ‘lepas tangkapan’ technique is a
technique to unlock any clinch or catch from an opponent.
Block and Punch:
The blocking technique is used to block any hand or
leg attack from the opponent and followed by counter attack using the hand to
punch the opponent.
Block and Kick:
The blocking technique is used to block any hand or
leg attack from the opponent and followed by counter attack using the leg to
kick the opponent.
Block and Sweep:
The blocking technique is used to block any hand or
leg attack from the opponent and followed by counter attack using sweeping
technique to the opponent.
Fake Punch:
An action which a silat exponent intends to confuse
the opponent using a fake punch to break his opponent’s defensive posture.
Fake Kick:
An action which a silat exponent intends to confuse
the opponent using a fake kick to break his opponent defensive posture.
Others:
Both silat exponents are either in posture position
‘sikap pasang’ or coming close to each other using silat step pattern ‘pola
langkah’.
All the activities are considered high intensity
except for others which at that time both silat exponents are in low intensity
periods.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND RESULT
- Men’s Class B Final Thailand versus Malaysia(Malaysia Win)
Action
|
Outcome
|
||||
Hit elsewhere
|
Hit target
|
Miss target
|
Total
|
||
Block
|
3
|
4
|
|
7
|
|
Block and kick
|
|
|
4
|
4
|
|
Block and punch
|
|
|
5
|
5
|
|
Block and sweep
|
2
|
3
|
|
5
|
|
Kick
|
25
|
19
|
31
|
75
|
|
Fake kick
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
|
Punch
|
10
|
9
|
21
|
40
|
|
Fake punch
|
|
3
|
|
3
|
|
Self-release
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topple
|
|
|
10
|
10
|
|
Sweep
|
|
1
|
9
|
10
|
|
Catch
|
|
3
|
4
|
7
|
|
Dodge
|
|
|
3
|
3
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
42
|
42
|
87
|
171
|
|
TABLE 1
|
Hit Target
|
Hit Elsewhere
|
Miss Target
|
Total
|
Malaysia
|
42
|
42
|
87
|
171
|
Thailand
|
28
|
32
|
68
|
128
|
Group Statistics
|
|||||
|
group
|
N
|
Mean
|
Std. Deviation
|
Std. Error Mean
|
score
|
malaysia
|
3
|
57.0000
|
25.98076
|
15.00000
|
thailand
|
3
|
42.6667
|
22.03028
|
12.71919
|
- Men’s Class E Final Vietnam versus Malaysia (Malaysia win)
Action
|
Outcome
|
||||
Hit elsewhere
|
Hit target
|
Miss target
|
Total
|
||
Block
|
4
|
3
|
4
|
11
|
|
Block and kick
|
|
|
5
|
5
|
|
Block and punch
|
|
|
3
|
3
|
|
Block and sweep
|
2
|
2
|
|
4
|
|
Kick
|
27
|
12
|
31
|
70
|
|
Fake kick
|
|
|
|
|
|
Punch
|
10
|
8
|
20
|
38
|
|
Fake punch
|
|
2
|
|
2
|
|
Self-release
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topple
|
|
|
10
|
10
|
|
Sweep
|
|
1
|
9
|
10
|
|
Catch
|
|
3
|
2
|
5
|
|
Dodge
|
|
|
3
|
3
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
43
|
31
|
87
|
161
|
|
TABLE 2
|
Hit Target
|
Hit Elsewhere
|
Miss Target
|
Total
|
Malaysia
|
31
|
43
|
87
|
161
|
Vietnam
|
28
|
45
|
76
|
149
|
Group Statistics
|
|||||
|
group
|
N
|
Mean
|
Std. Deviation
|
Std. Error Mean
|
score
|
malaysia
|
3
|
53.6667
|
29.48446
|
17.02286
|
vietnam
|
3
|
49.6667
|
24.33790
|
14.05149
|
- Men’s Class F Semi-Final Singapore versus
Malaysia (Malaysia lost)
Action
|
Outcome
|
||||
Hit elsewhere
|
Hit target
|
Miss opponent
|
Total
|
||
Block
|
2
|
12
|
|
14
|
|
Block and kick
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
|
Block and punch
|
3
|
2
|
|
5
|
|
Block and sweep
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kick
|
14
|
13
|
8
|
35
|
|
Fake kick
|
|
|
|
|
|
Punch
|
10
|
23
|
13
|
46
|
|
Fake punch
|
|
|
|
|
|
Self-release
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
Topple
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Sweep
|
|
|
|
|
|
Catch
|
4
|
4
|
2
|
10
|
|
Dodge
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
35
|
55
|
24
|
117
|
|
TABLE 3
|
Hit Target
|
Hit Elsewhere
|
Miss Target
|
Total
|
Malaysia
|
56
|
45
|
47
|
148
|
Singapore
|
39
|
50
|
43
|
132
|
Group Statistics
|
|||||
|
group
|
N
|
Mean
|
Std. Deviation
|
Std. Error Mean
|
score
|
malaysia
|
3
|
56.0000
|
11.00000
|
6.35085
|
singapore
|
3
|
44.0000
|
5.56776
|
3.21455
|
- Men’s Class H Final Indonesia versus
Malaysia (Malaysia lost)
Action
|
Outcome
|
||||
Hit elsewhere
|
Hit target
|
Miss target
|
Total
|
||
Block
|
1
|
2
|
4
|
7
|
|
Block and kick
|
3
|
|
3
|
6
|
|
Block and punch
|
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
|
Block and sweep
|
|
|
5
|
5
|
|
Kick
|
27
|
16
|
31
|
74
|
|
Fake kick
|
|
|
|
|
|
Punch
|
13
|
7
|
25
|
45
|
|
Fake punch
|
|
|
|
|
|
Self-release
|
|
|
2
|
2
|
|
Topple
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
5
|
|
Sweep
|
1
|
1
|
|
2
|
|
Catch
|
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
|
Dodge
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
46
|
39
|
76
|
152
|
|
TABLE
4
|
Hit Target
|
Hit Elsewhere
|
Miss Target
|
Total
|
Malaysia
|
39
|
50
|
76
|
165
|
Indonesia
|
45
|
55
|
61
|
161
|
Group Statistics
|
|||||
|
group
|
N
|
Mean
|
Std. Deviation
|
Std. Error Mean
|
score
|
malaysia
|
3
|
55.0000
|
19.00000
|
10.96966
|
indonesia
|
3
|
53.6667
|
8.08290
|
4.66667
|
DISCUSSION
The table show that the game
of silat in sea game. There are have 4 type of classes that have analyse in
this sea game. Table 1 show that the game of Malaysia verses Thailand. In this
game, both of the country have their own strength and weakness. Event thought,
Malaysia good in attacking to opponent that have 42 hit target to the opponent
and Thailand only 28 hit the target but Thailand give more pressure to
Malaysia. Malaysia more aggressive than Thailand that give Malaysia more
attacking and won this game.
The
second table showed that the game between Malaysia verses Vietnam in final
class E. In this game, hit target for Vietnam just less 3 point with Malaysia
and attack more often than Malaysia with miss target 87 bigger than Malaysia.
Malaysia won this game with accurate target.
Third
table showed that, the game of silat Malaysia with Singapore in semi-final in
class F. In this game, Malaysia attack their opponent more than Singapore that
total hit is 148 than Singapore that 132. Singapore have their own strength
that can bit Malaysia and there was win in this game.
Lastly,
table four show that the game in class H that Malaysia verses Indonesia in
final game. In this game, Malaysia was good in hitting the opponent but the hit
is not too accurate to the opponent. Indonesia have few hit that just 161 hit
but more accurate than Malaysia .in this game, Malaysia was lost because low in
hit target.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, Malaysia’s team have
good player and give great fight to opponent. Malaysia also can fight and win
in many game with improving their skill and hit target or the accuracy in
hitting. All athlete’s Malaysia need more practice and reduce their simple
mistake that they did in privies game. Base on the data, athlete Malaysia give
more attacking to opponent than other country.
RECOMMENDATION
As we know that occasionally, individuals commit
errors and people are not perfect but rather we can practice to be the best.
Silat athletes should practice more on their target and technique to improve
their performance especially on catch, dodge, punch, kick, sweep, and topple.
After that, silat is a martial art, we should prepare longer to improve the
technique and the most important thing is the strength of the athlete so they
can't sweep or topple. Besides, video investigation can be recognize the
athlete weakness.
REFERENCE
1. Jähnichen,
G. (n.d.). 4 Gendang Silat: Observations from Stong (Kelantan) and from Kuala
Penyu (Sabah). The Fighting Art of Pencak Silat and its Music, 167-181.
doi:10.1163/9789004308756_006
2. Grave,
J. D. (n.d.). 1 The Standardisation of Pencak Silat: Javanisation, Nationalism,
and Internationalisation. The Fighting Art of Pencak Silat and its Music,
45-75. doi:10.1163/9789004308756_003
3. Farrer,
D. S. (2009). The Guru Silat. Shadows of the Prophet, 175-198.
doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9356-2_5
4. Marwan,
I. (2014). Learning Single Stance Pencak Silat through Computer Based Training
(CBT). Asian Social Science, 10(5). doi:10.5539/ass.v10n5p35
5. Shapie,
M. N., & Elias, M. S. (2016). Silat: The curriculum of Seni Silat Malaysia.
Revista de Artes Marciales Asiáticas, 11(2s), 122.
doi:10.18002/rama.v11i2s.4202
6. Binson,
B. (n.d.). 3 Silat: A Muslim Traditional Martial Art in Southern Thailand. The
Fighting Art of Pencak Silat and its Music, 125-166. doi:10.1163/9789004308756_005
7. Widiastuti,
W. (2014). Using game approach in improving learning outcomes of pencak silat. Asian Social Science, 10(5), 168.
8. Abidin,
N. Z., & Adam, M. B. (2013). Prediction of vertical jump height from
anthropometric factors in male and female martial arts athletes. The Malaysian
journal of medical sciences: MJMS, 20(1), 39.
9. Mason,
P. H. (n.d.). 7 Pencak Silat Seni in West Java, Indonesia. The Fighting Art of
Pencak Silat and its Music, 235-263. doi:10.1163/9789004308756_009
10. Farrer,
D. S. (2009). Seni Silat Haqq Melayu: A Sufi Martial Art. Shadows of the
Prophet, 3-42. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9356-2_1
- Shapie, M. N. M., Oliver, J., O’Donoghue, P., &
Tong, R. (2014). Fitness characteristics of youth silat performers. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine,
1, 147-155.
- Pencak Silat Tanding Men's Class
E Final VIE vs MAS (Day 9) | 28th SEA Games Singapore 2015
- Pencak Silat Tanding Men's Class
H Final INA vs MAS (Day 9) | 28th SEA Games Singapore 2015
- Pencak Silat Tanding Men's Class F Semi-Final SIN vs MAS
(Day 8) | 28th SEA Games Singapore 2015
- Pencak Silat Tanding Class E
Men's Indonesia vs Malaysia (Day 7) | 28th SEA Games Singapore 2015
Comments
Post a Comment